在 2012-12-06四的 10:08 +0800，li guang写道：
> 在 2012-12-05三的 09:53 +0100，Jan Kiszka写道：
> > On 2012-12-05 01:51, li guang wrote:
> > > 在 2012-12-04二的 11:26 +0000，Peter Maydell写道：
> > >> On 4 December 2012 11:11, Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com> wrote:
> > >>> On 2012-12-04 11:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > >>>> Doesn't this break the use of this function in
> > >>>> target-i386/seg_helper.c:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) {
> > >>>>
> > >>>> which specifically wants to determine whether the breakpoint is
> > >>>> enabled only locally?
> > >
> > > It was changed to 'if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i)) {'
> > > in patch 3/3
> >
> > Which is broken as it neglects the different types of "enabled".
> >
> > >
> > >>>
> > >>> It does. And that also indicates the function is misnamed. Something
> > >>> like hw_breakpoint_state might be better.
> > >>
> > >
> > > misnamed? I think hw_breakpoint_enabled is ask whether breakpoint
> > > ^^^^^^^^
> > > is enabled or not, so it's almost suitable.
> >
> > There are two types of enabled breakpoints: task-local and global. The
> > current hw_breakpoint_enabled returns both as a bitmask, and that is
> > causing the confusing and regression in your patches.
> >
>
> It is no doubt that 'hw_breakpoint_enabled' is only check local
> breakpoint, you know, so, do we really have to handle all the cases
> since seems there's nowhere uses global breapoints at present?
Oh, you're right, I'll fix it.
Thanks!
>
> > Jan
> >
>
--
regards!
li guang
