Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> writes: > >> Hi >> >> Changes for yesterday: >> - Paolo Acked the series >> - Rebaso on top of today git (only conflicts were due to header re-shuffle) >> >> Please pull. >> >> [20121219] >> >> This is my queue for migration-thread and patches associated. This >> integrates review comments & code for Paolo. This is the subset from >> both approachs that we agreed with. rest of patches need more review >> and are not here. > > This breaks migration. Here's my test case: > > #!/bin/sh > > gzip -d -c lidb.ssmall.img.gz | \ > ~/build/qemu/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -cdrom \ > ~/isos/OCDC-lucid-Test-Drive-20110523_140333.iso -enable-kvm -m 2G \ > -incoming exec:dd > > With lidb.ssmall.img.gz being generated from a 'migrate exec:dd of=...' > from qemu.git just a week or two ago. > > I can't bisect tonight but can attempt to tomorrow. How has this been > tested?
I have tested with tcp, load/not-load with guests form 4GB to 16GB RAM. Will test tomorrow with your test case. I didn't tested exec:, though. > > I'm a little concerned here about the timing. With the Christmas > and New Years holiday we're pretty darn close to soft freeze for 1.4. > > Has this series gone through a full autotest run with multiple guests? Will re-test tomorrow with autotest. Sorry, Juan.
