Am 05.01.2013 04:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> writes: >> Am 02.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>> 2) Patches that no longer apply via git am --3way will receive a >>> notification. >> >> Isn't Nacked-by too strong of a notification for a mere technical need >> for a rebase (compared to a rejection of its concept/approach)? > > Yeah, I need some sort of tag though for tracking purposes.. Maybe > Rejected-by...
Sorry, forgot to mention: I wanted to propose Bounced-by. >> Also, since quite a few of such messages have been appearing on the list >> already, might it make sense to shorten the message and rather link to >> some qemu.org Wiki page to spare subscribers' mailboxes? > > I'm focusing at the moment on getting the code in shape to release. We > can tweak the text bits over time. Patches will only send one mail > per-thread so it's unlikely that it will ever cause a space problem even > in the stingiest of corporate mailbox quotas :-) We shouldn't forgot non-corporate mailboxes since QEMU is a community project. :-) I was rather thinking about disk space long-term though and these messages mostly reaching core community members so far that don't need detailed explaining. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
