From: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
Previously we silently exited, with subclasses we got an opcode warning.
Instead, explicitly tell the user what's wrong.
An indication for this is -cpu ? showing "host" with an all-zero PVR.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
---
target-ppc/kvm.c | 8 ++++++++
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
index ce7d69b..4846acf 100644
--- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
+++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
@@ -1232,7 +1232,15 @@ static void alter_insns(uint64_t *word, uint64_t flags,
bool on)
static void kvmppc_host_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
{
+ PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_GET_CLASS(obj);
+
assert(kvm_enabled());
+
+ if (pcc->info->pvr != mfpvr()) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Your host CPU is unsupported.\n"
+ "Please choose a supported model instead, see -cpu ?.\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
}
static void kvmppc_host_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
--
1.6.0.2
