On 7 January 2013 22:10, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > Am 07.01.2013 21:16, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 7 January 2013 20:12, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: >>>> It seems to me like arbitrarily allowing the monitor to construct >>>> no-user devices isn't really the right way to attack the problem >>>> of "allow complete machine construction by management tools"... >>> >>> There is no such thing as a 'no-user' device. It's a silly distinction >>> that has never had a consistent meaning. >> >> Then let's just rip that flag out completely. > > That's a bad idea, given that we are about to make the CPU a device.
We already have a pile of devices which the user can't usefully use -device on...CPUs would be just another one, right? -- PMM
