Am 10.12.2012 03:22, schrieb liguang: > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
For a patch series consisting of more than 1 patch, please use a cover letter (e.g., --cover-letter) that details the change history of the versions. That also facilitates commenting on the series vs. a single patch. > --- > target-i386/cpu.h | 7 +++++++ > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h > index 90ef1ff..29245d1 100644 > --- a/target-i386/cpu.h > +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h > @@ -231,6 +231,13 @@ > #define DR7_TYPE_SHIFT 16 > #define DR7_LEN_SHIFT 18 > #define DR7_FIXED_1 0x00000400 > +#define DR7_LOCAL_BP_MASK 0x55 > +#define DR7_MAX_BP 4 > +#define DR7_TYPE_BP_INST 0x0 > +#define DR7_TYPE_DATA_WR 0x1 > +#define DR7_TYPE_IO_RW 0x2 > +#define DR7_TYPE_DATA_RW 0x3 > + > > #define PG_PRESENT_BIT 0 > #define PG_RW_BIT 1 These defines are being introduced but not used in this patch yet. If you were to replace, e.g., 4 -> DR7_MAX_BP in this patch instead of patch 3/3, I would see a value in cherry-picking it. Assuming there is agreement on that name, of course. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
