Hi, On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Michael Matz wrote:
> But I'm not talking about the clobber list at all. I reacted to the > first mail forwarded to me, which was a question specifically about the > hunk adding the "q" constraint, whose purpose I explained. Are you now > also asking about the changes regarding %ecx and the clobber list? Okay, look, I do not have enough time to fix it myself. But there _is_ a breakage with gcc 3.4.2 on MinGW. If that is not fixed, I will openly oppose that patch going into CVS. All I tried was to get an understanding why the current patch "Fix i386" (which is still misnamed) broke on MinGW. Seems like I am not able to get that understanding, but at least it compiles again with those "#ifdef GCC..." removed. Ciao, Dscho
