On Sunday 24 March 2013, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > For future kernels, let's build in some hook that let > qemu detect a non broken guest. How about writing > some magic value into revision ID or some other > readonly field?
Yes, makes sense.
On Sunday 24 March 2013, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > For future kernels, let's build in some hook that let > qemu detect a non broken guest. How about writing > some magic value into revision ID or some other > readonly field?
Yes, makes sense.