On 03/26/2013 07:43 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>> The alternative is to have cpu-set-online and later cpu-set-offline. Quite >>> verbose, but doesn't have issues. > It looks like better as way to go. Later on we could keep them for > compatibility sake and map it to device_add/device_del commands when they are > ready. >
> Considering all said above, would it be acceptable to replace cpu-set with > "cpu_add id=xx" command? cpu_add id=xx from HMP, cpu-add from QMP is fine for getting things started; it still leaves room for a future 'cpu-set' batching command if batching turns out to be useful. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
