On 4 April 2013 15:45, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > Il 04/04/2013 16:37, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> (I can entirely believe that we get this wrong in a lot of >> places, and that in theory just about anything in a target_ >> struct needs an alignment specifier.) > > Yes, or more simply just use abi_* types. It doesn't help that > potential problems would only show up on m68k.
Mmm. Maybe we could use an addition to HACKING which at least defines what the "right thing" is for new target structs (and when you should use abi_* vs target_*). PS: LTP test run says no new failures, so that's good. -- PMM
