On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:08:22AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 09/04/2013 10:04, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: > >> > > >> > Looks good, but given there are patches to fix it, I'm not sure it's > >> > worth the trouble... > > Shouldn't this perform even a little better? And we should get rid of > > non-vectored interfaces in the block layer anyway. > > Yes, if you have a very fast disk it should. Network throughput with > Orit's patches jumped from 2.9 Gbps to 4.2 Gbps. But savevm is not > live, so it is not as important to make it really fast.
Users have been asking about poor savevm/loadvm performance recently. I think anything we can do it improve it, especially since these patches already exist, is good. Stefan