On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:58, Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de> wrote: > Is patch 4 (call handling) needed, or is it an optimization? > If it is needed, the tcg disassembler has to be extended as well. In fact tci has no stack and robber registers and doesn't need simulate the CPU work. I am trying to remove tcg_reg_alloc() in tcg_reg_alloc_op() & tcg_reg_alloc_call() and access the temporary variables directly in tci.
> And did patch 5 (inline) speed up the code? I had expected > that static functions don't need inline, because the compiler > can optimize them anyway. You are right, patch 5 is not needed.
