On 21 May 2013 10:02, Li Zhang <zhlci...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2013年05月21日 16:45, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 21 May 2013 09:39, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Libvirt has always had support for specifying what machine type to use.
>> OK, that makes sense. So is the problem here just configuration >> or is it the next layer above libvirt not being configurable? > > > Currently, the next layer above libvirt is not configurable. > It is dependent on this default setting. Users also expect > to start one VM successfully by default. Right. I think we've now identified the bit of software whose x86-centric assumptions need fixing :-) thanks -- PMM
