Il 02/06/2013 18:04, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > On 2 June 2013 16:43, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> -int qemu_ram_addr_from_host(void *ptr, ram_addr_t *ram_addr); >> +MemoryRegion *qemu_ram_addr_from_host(void *ptr, ram_addr_t *ram_addr); >> ram_addr_t qemu_ram_addr_from_host_nofail(void *ptr); > > This is weird, because now the _nofail and the standard > versions of this function return different things. Why > wouldn't a caller of the _nofail version potentially > need the MemoryRegion* too?
I'll adjust both functions. Paolo
