On 5 June 2013 10:04, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > In terms of policy, we should consider buildbot coverage as a > requirement for a platform/architecture to be fully supported. Fully > supported means (1) that code will be rejected/reverted if it breaks one > of these platforms (2) breaking these platforms will be a release > blocker.
I think this is a sensible policy, even though FreeBSD is a platform that people are testing and care about, but currently lacks a buildbot. One of the reasons for that is that until recently building QEMU on FreeBSD required patches only found in the FreeBSD ports tree. I hope that we'll have a FreeBSD 9.1 and CURRENT buildbot available shortly.
