Am 09.06.2013 19:17, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 9 June 2013 17:10, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>> The memory mapping API uses hwaddr, so use it in the struct, too.
>> This avoids a header dependency on target_ulong type.
>
>> --- a/include/sysemu/memory_mapping.h
>> +++ b/include/sysemu/memory_mapping.h
>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>> /* The physical and virtual address in the memory mapping are contiguous. */
>> typedef struct MemoryMapping {
>> hwaddr phys_addr;
>> - target_ulong virt_addr;
>> + hwaddr virt_addr;
>> ram_addr_t length;
>
> This seems kind of odd given that HACKING specifically
> says that target_ulong is for virtual addresses and hwaddr
> for physical addresses. And in fact all the places that call
> memory_mapping_list_add_merge_sorted() actually pass a
> target_ulong as the virt_addr parameter, so maybe what we
> should be fixing is the function prototype?
Maybe. The benefit with going with the overwhelming use of hwaddr is
that memory_mapping.o can be compiled once for all targets, saving
compilation time.
The benefit of target_ulong would be saving a few bytes for 32-bit
targets at runtime.
> Incidentally that use of ram_addr_t for length looks
> kind of suspicious to me; it should probably be a hwaddr.
Looking at it strictly from a CPU and build perspective I'll happily
leave further code cleanups to someone else. :) Somewhere there's also a
misspelling of "memory" left to fix.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
