2013/6/21 Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>: > > On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote: > >> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case >> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor. >> >> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx >> processors based on it. Therefore, adding the high BATs and the SPRG >> 4..7 registers, which are e600-specific [1]. >> >> This allows to define the MPC8610 processor too and my program running >> on a real MPC8610 target is now able to run on qemu :) >> >> [1] http://cache.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/ref_manual/E600CORERM.pdf >> >> Signed-off-by: Julio Guerra <gu...@julio.in> > > Thanks, applied to ppc-next. >
I just retested this patch and I noticed the `handle_mmu_fault` default value introduced by recent A. Farber patches on the CPU definitions is wrong with the selected memory model. Thus qemu complains about the MMU model. The following is missing in e600 CPU definition: > #if defined(CONFIG_SOFTMMU) > ppc->handle_mmu_fault = ppc_hash32_handle_mmu_fault; > #endif Can you correct it or should I resend a patch (v3 or just the previous three lines) ? -- Julio Guerra
