On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Paul Durrant wrote: > > - the Citrix [vendor id|device id] pair has to be different from the > > xenproject one (0x5853|0x0001). I am sure we can arrange the > > xenproject device id space so that Windows PV drivers vendors don't have > > to acquire their own PCI vendor ids. > > > > This all sounds fine; it's a generalization of what I've already coded up so > I'm happy to refactor it. Any suggestions on a name? "xen-pvdevice", perhaps, > to link it to your proposed VM config option?
xen-pvdevice is good for me
