On 6 July 2013 13:40, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > softmmu would do it after the future QMP qom-set phase. The mess there > is reset handler registration order: We cannot have most CPUs register a > reset handler themselves yet because some machines (including most ARM > ones) register reset handlers to tweak registers before the CPU would > have reset in that future scenario.
I'm not really a fan of that "use reset handler to simulate bootloader firmware" code, so if you have a cleaner solution to suggest I'd be happy to move to that. (if the cleaner solution is "provide a firmware blob for all boards" that might be too much work though :-)) -- PMM
