Hi Peter,
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> The OpenRISC kernel ignores CLONE_SETTLS in its copy_thread()
> implementation, so a cpu_set_tls() implementation is a no-op.
> cpu_clone_regs() was setting the syscall return value in the
> wrong register -- it is gpr[11], not gpr[2]. With these two
> things fixed, we can compile with NPTL enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
> ---
> configure | 1 -
> linux-user/openrisc/target_cpu.h | 9 +++++++--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 4a241e0..3848c1c 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -4229,7 +4229,6 @@ case "$target_name" in
> or32)
> TARGET_ARCH=openrisc
> TARGET_BASE_ARCH=openrisc
> - target_nptl="no"
> ;;
I noticed configure have no this line.
> ppc)
> gdb_xml_files="power-core.xml power-fpu.xml power-altivec.xml
> power-spe.xml"
> diff --git a/linux-user/openrisc/target_cpu.h
> b/linux-user/openrisc/target_cpu.h
> index 501fb81..32a46ac 100644
> --- a/linux-user/openrisc/target_cpu.h
> +++ b/linux-user/openrisc/target_cpu.h
> @@ -25,9 +25,14 @@ static inline void cpu_clone_regs(CPUOpenRISCState *env,
> target_ulong newsp)
> if (newsp) {
> env->gpr[1] = newsp;
> }
> - env->gpr[2] = 0;
> + env->gpr[11] = 0;
> }
>
> -/* TODO: need to implement cpu_set_tls() */
> +static inline void cpu_set_tls(CPUOpenRISCState *env, target_ulong newtls)
> +{
> + /* Linux kernel 3.10 does not pay any attention to CLONE_SETTLS
> + * in copy_thread(), so QEMU need not do so either.
> + */
> +}
Thanks for fix. It looks good to me.
I need to reply here a Reviewed-by: Jia Liu <pro...@gmail.com> , yes?
>
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
Regards,
Jia
