On Thursday, July 18, 2013 10:31:46 PM Peter Maydell wrote: > On 18 July 2013 21:05, Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, July 18, 2013 08:48:10 PM Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 18 July 2013 20:39, Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > On the plus side, I think libseccomp is very close to being pretty much > >> > feature complete (excluding new architectures that may pop up, at > >> > present > >> > we are only x86, x86_64, x32, and ARM) > >> > >> ...AArch64 ? :-) > > > > Not yet, just 32-bit ARM EABI. > > > > If you've got a working system and are willing to so some hacking or run > > some tests we could work on it for a future libseccomp release. An > > emulated AArch64 VM would also work, but that route can be slow/annoying. > > Simulators are all we have right now (we're juuust getting to the > point where hardware is starting to become available). I wasn't > being serious really, though I'm sure somebody (possibly even > somebody at Red Hat :-)) will work around to it at some point.
Regardless, consider it a standing offer. -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat
