On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 22/07/2013 12:10, Orit Wasserman ha scritto: > > > As discussed offlist, I would prefer to have this in the kernel since > > > that's where the bug is. Gleb disagrees. > > > > As this is a migration bug I prefer to fix it in the migration code only. > > Fixing it in the kernel will effect all scenarios that load the segments, > > in userspace it is only in load VM code. > > Ok, here's the third person. Sorry for not thinking of you in the first > place. :)
I'm coming late to the discussion, but: I fullly agree with Orit and Gleb, especially about patch 1/2. Patch 2/2 is not strictly necessary if the destination host kernel gets fixed (latest kernels are already fixed), but it is nice to have it, to not require a kernel upgrade. -- Eduardo
