On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:39:27AM +0100, Filip Navara wrote: > I'd say it is preferable to split the individual devices and model > them using the QDEV infrastructure instead of putting it all together > into one "system controller" device. > > I've QDEV-based implementation of these devices already: PMC, DBGU, > PIO, PITC, AIC. That leaves the "bus matrix", SDRAM controller and > USART (which is very similar to DBGU) to be split up. >
I also see ethernet IP block (emac), I have plans to implement it, what about USB slave and CAN controller, you plan/have implementations of them? -- /Evgeniy
