> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:19:51AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Most of the block layer is under the BSD license, thus it is reasonable > > to license block/raw.c the same way. CCed people should ACK by replying > > with a Signed-off-by line. > > The coded was intended to be GPLv2.
I guess some day we'll rewrite it, perhaps when libqblock is closer to being merged. Paolo
