On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 19:47:50 +0300 Orit Wasserman <owass...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 05:50 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 11:46:14 +0300 > > Orit Wasserman <owass...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> "ram" is present also when migration completes. > >> total-time and downtime are no longer part of "ram" data. > > > > expected-downtime has to be moved too, looks good otherwise. > > I will fix it in a separate patch. Why not quickly respin the patch with the instances of the same problem fixed?
