On 09/26/2013 05:48 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> + case 0x0e:
> + if (!get_bits(insn, 31, 1) && !get_bits(insn, 29, 1) &&
> + (get_bits(insn, 10, 6) == 0x3)) {
> + handle_dupg(s, insn);Is this really better than (insn & y) == x ? r~
