Il 02/10/2013 14:41, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto: > +static inline void pci_irq_pulse(PCIDevice *pci_dev) > +{ > + pci_irq_lower(pci_dev); > + pci_irq_raise(pci_dev); > +} > +
Why is this in the opposite order, compared to qemu_irq_pulse? Paolo
Il 02/10/2013 14:41, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto: > +static inline void pci_irq_pulse(PCIDevice *pci_dev) > +{ > + pci_irq_lower(pci_dev); > + pci_irq_raise(pci_dev); > +} > +
Why is this in the opposite order, compared to qemu_irq_pulse? Paolo