2009/12/2 Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>: > Artyom Tarasenko wrote: >> 2009/12/1 Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Could someone with commit rights please stand up to feel responsible for >>> PPC? >>> >>> Usually, when I send a patch to qemu-devel, I know who to address to >>> increase chances of it getting committed. For kvm/vnc/block I just CC >>> Anthony, for Audio I just CC malc, etc. >> >> And who can increase chances of getting committed for a scsi-related patch? >> I sent a patch on November, the 10th >> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/38100/), >> and it looks like it was just ignored. >> > > Patch is line-wrapped (following your link to patchwork makes this obvious).
Oh. Can it be that a simultaneous inlining and attachment (what Blue Swirl suggested few weeks ago) is not compatible with patchwork? The patch in the attachment doesn't seem to be line-wrapped. Will have to find a way to persuade gmail not to wrap patches. > Note that the merge process can be quite silent. Hearing nothing for a > while (some weeks) may also mean that your patch suddenly pops up in the > tree - given it's clean and no one complained. Already experienced that too. :)
