于 2013/10/18 17:44, Paolo Bonzini 写道:
Il 18/10/2013 03:11, Wenchao Xia ha scritto:
This remove additional code path about where to print the error,
error_vprintf() is only the controller now, making future change
easier.

The logic is not changed since when cur_mon = NULL, error_vprintf()
will still print to stderr.

Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <xiaw...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
  util/qemu-error.c |   11 ++++++++++-
  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/util/qemu-error.c b/util/qemu-error.c
index d1e858a..c29fcbd 100644
--- a/util/qemu-error.c
+++ b/util/qemu-error.c
@@ -151,6 +151,15 @@ const char *error_get_progname(void)
      return progname;
  }
+static void error_print_progname(const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+    va_list ap;
+
+    va_start(ap, fmt);
+    error_vprintf(fmt, ap);
+    va_end(ap);
+}
+
  /*
   * Print current location to current monitor if we have one, else to stderr.
   */
@@ -161,7 +170,7 @@ static void error_print_loc(void)
      const char *const *argp;
if (!cur_mon && progname) {
-        fprintf(stderr, "%s: ", progname);
+        error_print_progname("%s: ", progname);
      }
      switch (cur_loc->kind) {
      case LOC_CMDLINE:

I agree that using fprintf looks odd, but why not use error_printf directly?

Paolo

I used custom function since I have a following modification in my private branch. Since
it is not send, I will use error_printf(), which is more straight.


Reply via email to