Il 25/10/2013 05:30, Lei Li ha scritto:
>>>
>> I am not sure about the name; for one thing, the new state would apply
>> also to postcopy migration.
>
> About the name, how about 'live-upgrade'?
>
> OK, I'll add the transition between postcopy and this new state.
Note I didn't mean "postmigrate".
For a description of postcopy, see my answer to the cover letter ("patch
0"). The new state means "somebody else has newer contents of the
memory". Perhaps "stale"?
> And should it also apply from 'prelaunch' to 'flipping-migrate' too?
Yes, it should. Good catch!
Paolo
