Il 25/10/2013 16:03, Michael R. Hines ha scritto: > > Well, I tried posting libvirt support with this naming scheme, > but they didn't accepted. > > Their reason (Daniel, I think) is valid: experimental implies that it > shouldn't be exposed in the management software until it is > deemed stable at some point. > > As far we can tell, it is stable, and made very clear using the new > 'setup' state in the migration state machine.
Sure, x-rdma => rdma *is* stable. I'm not sure about x-rdma-pin-all though. Paolo
