Ian Molton <ian.mol...@collabora.co.uk> writes: > Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> p = malloc(n * sizeof(struct foo); >> if (n && !p) >> exit_no_mem(); >> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) >> compute_one(p, i); >> >> With qemu_malloc(), the error handling moves into qemu_malloc(): >> >> p = qemu_malloc(n * sizeof(struct foo); >> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) >> compute_one(p, i); > > And you lose the ability to fail gracefully...
That's a deliberate choice. It has its drawbacks, it has its advantages. And it's not related to the question at hand: permitting zero arguments.
