Il 18/11/2013 04:02, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: > On 11/15/2013 09:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 15/11/2013 06:14, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>> >>> It does not feel that we really need CPUState::kvm_cpu_id and >>> direct calling of kvm_arch_vcpu_id() would be enough. >> >> Indeed -- and it should be kvm_ppc_vcpu_id() since other architectures >> do not need it. > > And ignore kvm_arch_vcpu_id() for spapr/ppc?
Sorry, brain fart - i meant ppc_get_vcpu_dt_id but it has already been objected to earlier. So the patch is ok for me, modulo removal of kvm_cpu_id which you already proposed above. Paolo
