Il 19/11/2013 15:11, Peter Lieven ha scritto: >>>> >>> I already tried exactly this fix. Its reading index 0x0000004 for >>> increasing indexes until qemu aborts: >> Oops, it should be I guess "if ((*eax & 31) && cs->nr_cores > 1)". > Maybe, how should we continue. This should be fixed before 1.7 comes out.
If this works, I'll post a patch. Paolo
