On 11/19/2013 02:17 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 19.11.2013 19:26, schrieb Don Koch:
>> Prevent a call to put_kbd if null.
>>
>> On shutdown of some OSes, the keyboard handler goes away before the
>> system is down. If a key is typed during this window, qemu crashes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Don Koch <dk...@verizon.com>
>> ---
>> I left the printf call, originally for testing, but useful as a sanity
>> check if the user wonders why his keyboard input was ignored. AFAIC,
>> it can be removed.
>
> I'd remove that printf and combine the two if statements in the final patch.
Works for me (if nobody thinks otherwise).
>>
>> PS: Anthony, your address in the MAINTAINER file is still at ibm.
>> I assume that is no longer correct, yes?
>
> The address is correct in the latest git version.
Count on me to be in the wrong branch when I checked that.
>>
>> ui/input.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ui/input.c b/ui/input.c
>> index 92c44ca..28ef6a6 100644
>> --- a/ui/input.c
>> +++ b/ui/input.c
>> @@ -415,8 +415,10 @@ void kbd_put_keycode(int keycode)
>> return;
>> }
>> if (entry) {
>> - entry->put_kbd(entry->opaque, keycode);
>> + if (entry->put_kbd)
>> + entry->put_kbd(entry->opaque, keycode);
>> + else
>> + printf("%s: no keyboard handler\n", __FUNCTION__);
>> }
>> }
>>
>
>
> Please check the coding style with scripts/checkpatch.pl.
Of course, I remembered to do this afterwards. Turns out, the only
problems will go away if I drop the printf. I meant to send a follow-up
stating that and that I would wait to see what the consensus was on
the printf before applying the appropriate changes (thunderbird had
other ideas :-( ).
>
> Regards,
> Stefan Weil
Thanks,
-d
