Hi, > I thought that for lines that are just a logical or of constants > it would be ok to go over 80 columns, since the alternatives > > (shortening the names of constants or breaking the line) > > are a little less readable.
I don't find the broken lines unreadable, especially if you align the stuff nicely like you did ... > ... and broke the two lines > that were still longer than 80 columns, ... here. But if you prefer it this way with the shorter constants, no problem, I'll happily take it as-is. cheers, Gerd
