> Am 17.12.2013 um 23:51 schrieb ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlb...@gmail.com>: > >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de> wrote: >> >> >>>> Am 17.12.2013 um 18:13 schrieb ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlb...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de> wrote: >>>> On 17.12.2013 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>> ... >>>>> Which NFS protocol versions are supported by current libnfs? >>>> >>>> Will check that out. Ronnie? >>> >>> It uses NFS v3 only. >> >> should we use nfs3:// for the urls then? > > No, I think we should leave it as nfs://... so that we are compatilbe > with rfc2224 > > Once/if/when I add support for v2 and v4 we can force a protocol > version using ?version=2 > > Then > nfs://server/foo/bar would be "use whatever versions the server offers" > but > nfs://server/foo/bar?version=2 would become "use version 2 only"
then i would leave it as is and add a comment to the commit message that only v3 is supported atm.
