On 27 December 2013 15:17, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > On 12/26/2013 02:34 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Looking a bit more closely, is it even possible for code64 to be >> 1 if we're in real or vm86 mode? If not, then the behaviour here >> is unchanged (ie still always zero extends). > > No, real or vm86 mode implies 16-bit.
In that case Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> since that means this patch isn't changing anything (though as you say the zero-extend is probably strictly speaking a bug). -- PMM
