-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Il 14/01/2014 18:40, William Dauchy ha scritto: >>> I think this was nacked already in the past. You would need to >>> implement some kind of ACL system like the one that is in place >>> for bridges. Without it, for example, you could hijack >>> existing iptables rules. > I don't get it; this does not change anything to the existing but > permits to change the default "tap" string prefix. > > Am I missing something?
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-03/msg04279.html and http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-10/msg02149.html for previous discussions on this topic. Paolo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS1YDdAAoJEBvWZb6bTYbyS64P/jJZT2FmUEqh1HiRLl5JA41C zUZSjs6yIPI2PBZTwAQFR8WbFoQd8WHusqZF2DyMsCCcQ/5SN+H70ZdVavkA30T+ SoiJ2KdBdZdSWocMr2VqU7nVVsUEVkYuVVmjAESB0z2uG+Z/BrJM0Y5LxPbqjAJT 3munoW3w0pU2v4v3zzm48W4GlOUQTsp1vqdIsXhKbMO40G+BuM95LiNyn6g+B+i+ G9rbLN3IVjnsGasIcUNGhMVoTaP4p+NufX7NVX1D0H46wVXgmtGjDRfva3EW2qvv P0WvTG4b1nRC20zXcmznfOrVd4d9XgtABByvkvzeY6Bawzp5ZW7nV31AVX7H7G+7 vG8AdttsgH3/mYN0VwzVAhwlmhxMbB3Ip3AnfCEGSTSPUV1rMsdA3xIiWZb5Kjqc xCZloSbLI0E1kFrVepoGBq0g81jVHaPM+BHpSUQSTCbuXqCHrgdm+z3kHkqZbpE8 HmAXkIn4ot4+Q3nZ8a0jEXC2ipJsNl9v8zkvPbTai/5/C2j+1aU7oBLXES63K19w DoUaFdSgHbEXMx/CTcryWjxdBCrOGiilpanObTIT9cfVbm0LfNLS8sZap3ATE5/6 o7OHQlZ1u0s91yikMiex+UkBjXt2mFJmJ/T/LbOI7rxFV+cnQoA1s7ErbvSa9jaC RIhf6mVXZGAzCLNVdJNz =PvwW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
