On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:30:16PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 23 January 2014 22:16, Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > As promised I hacked a prototype based on Paolo's disable TCG series. > > However I coded some stubs for TCG anyway. So this series in principle > > should work with / without Paolo's series. > > I'm afraid I still think this is a terrible idea. "Xen" isn't a CPU, and
Thanks for being blunt. ;-) > "the binary is smaller" isn't IMHO sufficient justification for breaking > QEMU's basic structure of "target-* define target CPUs and we have > a lot of compile time constants which are specific to a CPU which > get defined there". How would you support a bigendian Xen CPU, > just to pick one example of where this falls down? > I think about this deeper. From Xen's (and I speculate this applies to other hardware assisted virtulization solution as well) PoV only the native endianess is supported, does it make sense to have a target-native thing? Wei. > thanks -- PMM
