On 31 January 2014 15:53, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > PATCH 1/2 fixes a bug found by compiling the original PATCH 2/2. > Evidence for my claim that PATCH 2/2 lets the compiler catch more type > errors :) > > Markus Armbruster (2): > qga: Fix memory allocation pasto > Use g_new() & friends where that makes obvious sense
> 186 files changed, 376 insertions(+), 415 deletions(-) No objection in principle, but I think this is going to be hideous merge pain since it touches a huge range of files. Could you split it up into separate patches that could reasonably go in via the appropriate submaintainer trees? thanks -- PMM