On 31 January 2014 15:53, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> PATCH 1/2 fixes a bug found by compiling the original PATCH 2/2.
> Evidence for my claim that PATCH 2/2 lets the compiler catch more type
> errors :)
>
> Markus Armbruster (2):
>   qga: Fix memory allocation pasto
>   Use g_new() & friends where that makes obvious sense

>  186 files changed, 376 insertions(+), 415 deletions(-)

No objection in principle, but I think this is going to be
hideous merge pain since it touches a huge range of files.
Could you split it up into separate patches that could
reasonably go in via the appropriate submaintainer trees?

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to