Hi,
> > + switch (graphic_rotate) {
> > + case 90:
> > + if (evt->abs->axis == INPUT_AXIS_X) {
> > + evt->abs->axis = INPUT_AXIS_Y;
> > + }
> > + if (evt->abs->axis == INPUT_AXIS_Y) {
>
> Need else here, same for "case 270".
Why?
> > + evt->abs->axis = INPUT_AXIS_X;
> > + evt->abs->axis = INPUT_EVENT_ABS_SIZE - 1 - evt->abs->axis;
>
> ->value here, not ->axis.
Oops, indeed.
> It looks like doing it right for relative is easy:
But what is the point when this isn't used anyway?
>
> if (graphic_rotate == 0) {
> return;
> }
> if (move->axis != INPUT_AXIS_X && move->axis != INPUT_AXIS_Y) {
> return;
> }
> if ((graphic_rotate <= 180 && move->axis == INPUT_AXIS_X) ||
> (graphic_rotate >= 180 && move->axis == INPUT_AXIS_Y)) {
> if (kind == INPUT_EVENT_KIND_ABS) {
> move->value = INPUT_EVENT_ABS_SIZE - 1 - move->value;
> } else {
> move->value = -move->value;
> }
> }
> if (graphic_rotate == 90 || graphic_rotate == 270) {
> move->axis ^= INPUT_AXIS_X ^ INPUT_AXIS_Y;
> }
Saves a few lines but it's a bit harder to figure what is going on ...
cheers,
Gerd
