On 3 February 2014 21:27, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > On 02/01/2014 10:16 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> This looks at least superficially OK, but I'm not really familiar >> with QEMU's breakpoint/watchpoint support code. RTH: do >> you want to have a look over this one? > > It's copied verbatim from the i386 port, missing braces and all. > So it certainly passes the sniff test.
That sounds like we ought to be generalising our support code for bp/wp support in targets. Maybe I'll do that if/when I ever implement bp/wp support for ARM :-) thanks -- PMM
