On 4 February 2014 14:57, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > I suppose I have no major objection to the feature, although frankly it's > not especially exciting. I can't really imagine ever wanting to bulk trace > all of the helpers. Tracing specific helpers on a target-by-target basis, > sure. But that can be done just as easily as adding tracing code to any > other bit of C.
I think the things people seem to actually want (judging from occasional postings to the list) are things like: * trace all guest memory accesses * trace all guest instruction executions Does this patchset get us usefully towards that kind of thing? Not sure... thanks -- PMM
