On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:48:52PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 03:19:02PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> > >> wrote: > >> > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:08:43AM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kir...@shutemov.name> wrote: > >> >> >> ping? > >> >> > > >> >> > Blue or Anthony, please apply. > >> >> > Patch is needed to get libuser + pie working well. > >> >> > >> >> 0.12.0 has been tagged, but I think this is still good candidate > >> >> material for 0.12.1. > >> >> > >> > > >> > It doesn't seems to have been tagged yet. > >> > >> It's now. Anyway, I committed it to HEAD, please take it from there for > >> 0.12.1. > >> > > > > Then the best is to commit it to stable-0.12, this will ensure it is in > > 0.12.1. > > Actually, it broke compilation without -fpie, so I had to commit also > a fix. For 0.12.1 I think we want only one fixed commit. Does this > need a new patch with SoB etc. or can I just fix the patch? >
I think you can simplify fix the patch, maybe mentioning it in the comment. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
