Am 03.03.2014 um 12:43 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben: > On 21.02.2014 16:24, Kevin Wolf wrote: > >Instead of ignoring all option values but the last one, multiple -o > >options now have the same meaning as having a single option with all > >settings in the order of their respective -o options. > > > >Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> > >--- > > qemu-img.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c > >index 9c1643d..3fd2168 100644 > >--- a/qemu-img.c > >+++ b/qemu-img.c > >@@ -1164,6 +1164,9 @@ static int img_convert(int argc, char **argv) > > Error *local_err = NULL; > > QemuOpts *sn_opts = NULL; > >+ /* Initialize before goto out */ > >+ qemu_progress_init(progress, 1.0); > >+ > moving this up here breaks progrss output because progress is always false > at this point.
Meh. You're right, of course, this was a stupid one. I wonder if -p output is consistent enough that we can make a qemu-iotests case for it. At the moment I can't see a reason why it wouldn't be consistent. Kevin
