Hi Peter,
Im looking to do some cleanup around pl022 and I would like to use it
as my lead example of code using the new generic FIFO (as I think I
have test cases handy for it). But the VMSD description for this
device is a bit ugly as it is:
VMSTATE_INT32(tx_fifo_head, PL022State),
VMSTATE_INT32(rx_fifo_head, PL022State),
VMSTATE_INT32(tx_fifo_len, PL022State),
VMSTATE_INT32(rx_fifo_len, PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(tx_fifo[0], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(rx_fifo[0], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(tx_fifo[1], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(rx_fifo[1], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(tx_fifo[2], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(rx_fifo[2], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(tx_fifo[3], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(rx_fifo[3], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(tx_fifo[4], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(rx_fifo[4], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(tx_fifo[5], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(rx_fifo[5], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(tx_fifo[6], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(rx_fifo[6], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(tx_fifo[7], PL022State),
VMSTATE_UINT16(rx_fifo[7], PL022State),
There is a way to covert to Fifo while maintaining full backwards
compat (in much the same way as I did for serial), although as you can
imagine, it will be messy. Is it worth the VMSD version bump to get it
cleaned up?
Regards,
Peter
