On 05/05/2014 10:05 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
From: Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Fix ppc64 arch specific dump code to work correctly for little endian
guests.

We introduce a NoteFuncArg type to avoid adding extra arguments to all note
functions.

Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bhar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ rebased on top of current master branch,
   introduced NoteFuncArg,
   use new cpu_to_dump{16,32,64} endian helpers,
   Greg Kurz <gk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> ]
Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

Changes in v3:
- better taste with the endian helpers naming

  target-ppc/arch_dump.c |   82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target-ppc/arch_dump.c b/target-ppc/arch_dump.c
index 9dccf1a..5487b61 100644
--- a/target-ppc/arch_dump.c
+++ b/target-ppc/arch_dump.c
@@ -79,94 +79,109 @@ typedef struct noteStruct {
      } contents;
  } QEMU_PACKED Note;
+typedef struct NoteFuncArg {
+    Note note;
+    DumpState *state;
+} NoteFuncArg;
-static void ppc64_write_elf64_prstatus(Note *note, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
+static void ppc64_write_elf64_prstatus(NoteFuncArg *arg, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
  {
      int i;
      uint64_t cr;
      struct PPC64ElfPrstatus *prstatus;
      struct PPC64UserRegStruct *reg;
+    Note *note = &arg->note;
+    DumpState *s = arg->state;
- note->hdr.n_type = cpu_to_be32(NT_PRSTATUS);
+    note->hdr.n_type = cpu_to_dump32(s, NT_PRSTATUS);
prstatus = &note->contents.prstatus;
      memset(prstatus, 0, sizeof(*prstatus));
      reg = &prstatus->pr_reg;
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
-        reg->gpr[i] = cpu_to_be64(cpu->env.gpr[i]);
+        reg->gpr[i] = cpu_to_dump64(s, cpu->env.gpr[i]);
      }
-    reg->nip = cpu_to_be64(cpu->env.nip);
-    reg->msr = cpu_to_be64(cpu->env.msr);
-    reg->ctr = cpu_to_be64(cpu->env.ctr);
-    reg->link = cpu_to_be64(cpu->env.lr);
-    reg->xer = cpu_to_be64(cpu_read_xer(&cpu->env));
+    reg->nip = cpu_to_dump64(s, cpu->env.nip);
+    reg->msr = cpu_to_dump64(s, cpu->env.msr);
+    reg->ctr = cpu_to_dump64(s, cpu->env.ctr);
+    reg->link = cpu_to_dump64(s, cpu->env.lr);
+    reg->xer = cpu_to_dump64(s, cpu_read_xer(&cpu->env));
cr = 0;
      for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
          cr |= (cpu->env.crf[i] & 15) << (4 * (7 - i));
      }
-    reg->ccr = cpu_to_be64(cr);
+    reg->ccr = cpu_to_dump64(s, cr);
  }
-static void ppc64_write_elf64_fpregset(Note *note, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
+static void ppc64_write_elf64_fpregset(NoteFuncArg *arg, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
  {
      int i;
      struct PPC64ElfFpregset  *fpregset;
+    Note *note = &arg->note;
+    DumpState *s = arg->state;
- note->hdr.n_type = cpu_to_be32(NT_PRFPREG);
+    note->hdr.n_type = cpu_to_dump32(s, NT_PRFPREG);
fpregset = &note->contents.fpregset;
      memset(fpregset, 0, sizeof(*fpregset));
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
-        fpregset->fpr[i] = cpu_to_be64(cpu->env.fpr[i]);
+        fpregset->fpr[i] = cpu_to_dump64(s, cpu->env.fpr[i]);
      }
-    fpregset->fpscr = cpu_to_be64(cpu->env.fpscr);
+    fpregset->fpscr = cpu_to_dump64(s, cpu->env.fpscr);
  }
-static void ppc64_write_elf64_vmxregset(Note *note, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
+static void ppc64_write_elf64_vmxregset(NoteFuncArg *arg, PowerPCCPU *cpu)
  {
      int i;
      struct PPC64ElfVmxregset *vmxregset;
+    Note *note = &arg->note;
+    DumpState *s = arg->state;
- note->hdr.n_type = cpu_to_be32(NT_PPC_VMX);
+    note->hdr.n_type = cpu_to_dump32(s, NT_PPC_VMX);
      vmxregset = &note->contents.vmxregset;
      memset(vmxregset, 0, sizeof(*vmxregset));
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
-        vmxregset->avr[i].u64[0] = cpu_to_be64(cpu->env.avr[i].u64[0]);
-        vmxregset->avr[i].u64[1] = cpu_to_be64(cpu->env.avr[i].u64[1]);
+        vmxregset->avr[i].u64[0] = cpu_to_dump64(s, cpu->env.avr[i].u64[0]);
+        vmxregset->avr[i].u64[1] = cpu_to_dump64(s, cpu->env.avr[i].u64[1]);

Is this correct? Tom, could you please ack if it is?


Alex


Reply via email to