On 05/08/2014 10:49 AM, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote:
If we leave the target mode as big-endian, we need to teach the
elfloader to handle binary of reversed endianness. I have looked into
that possibility as well but find the current approach easier.
Please don't top post.
Ok, so if we really want to change the code to be able to handle
!TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN the whole notion of s->le_mode becomes flawed.
Instead, it should get renamed into needs_swab or needs_byteswap or
something along those lines. Then we can set it accordingly based on
msr_le and target configuration.
For the mem_helper.c changes, could you please explain why you have to
treat msr_le and needs_byteswap separately?
Thanks,
Alex
