On 05/27/2014 08:28 AM, Jeff Cody wrote: > On some image chains, QEMU may not always be able to resolve the > filenames properly, when updating the backing file of an image > after a block job. > > For instance, certain relative pathnames may fail, or drives may > have been specified originally by file descriptor (e.g. /dev/fd/???), > or a relative protocol pathname may have been used. > > In these instances, QEMU may lack the information to be able to make > the correct choice, but the user or management layer most likely does > have that knowledge. > > With this extension to the block-stream api, the user is able to change > the backing file of the active layer as part of the block-stream > operation. > > This allows the change to be 'safe', in the sense that if the attempt > to write the active image metadata fails, then the block-stream > operation returns failure, without disrupting the guest. > > If a backing file string is not specified in the command, the backing > file string to use is determined in the same manner as it was > previously. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jc...@redhat.com> > --- > block/stream.c | 13 ++++++++----- > blockdev.c | 12 +++++++++++- > hmp-commands.hx | 2 +- > hmp.c | 2 ++ > include/block/block_int.h | 2 +- > qapi-schema.json | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > qmp-commands.hx | 2 +- > 7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >
> @@ -220,7 +221,7 @@ void stream_start(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState > *base, > const char *base_id, int64_t speed, > BlockdevOnError on_error, > BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb, > - void *opaque, Error **errp) > + void *opaque, const char *backing_file_str, Error **errp) > { Umm, aren't the 'base_id' and 'backing_file_str' arguments redundant now? You only need one, not both, because there is only one backing string to be written (or cleared) into the active file. [1] > @@ -237,8 +238,10 @@ void stream_start(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState > *base, > } > > s->base = base; > - if (base_id) { > - pstrcpy(s->backing_file_id, sizeof(s->backing_file_id), base_id); > + if (backing_file_str) { > + s->backing_file_str = g_strdup(backing_file_str); > + } else { > + s->backing_file_str = g_strdup(base_id); g_strdup(NULL) is safely NULL, correct? (You hit this case when base_id is NULL, which happens when base is NULL). > @@ -1941,8 +1942,17 @@ void qmp_block_stream(bool has_device, const char > *device, > return; > } > > + /* if we are streaming from the bottommost base image, then specifying > + * a backing file does not make sense, and is an error */ Misleading (back to the complaint in 9/11) - omitting base is different from using the bottommost base image as base. I'd word that more like: If we are streaming the entire chain, then the result will have no backing file and specifying a backing name is an error > + if (base_bs == NULL && has_backing_file) { > + error_setg(errp, "backing file specified, but streaming from " > + "bottommost base image"); > + return; > + } The 'if' condition is correct and necessary, but the error message could use better wording; maybe: backing file specified but no base image supplied > stream_start(bs, base_bs, base_name, has_speed ? speed : 0, > - on_error, block_job_cb, bs, &local_err); > + on_error, block_job_cb, bs, > + has_backing_file ? backing_file : NULL, &local_err); [1] Again, how do 'base_name' and 'backing_file' differ at this point in the game? Isn't it just simpler to do: has_backing_file ? backing_file : base_name and use a single parameter? > +++ b/qapi-schema.json > @@ -2611,6 +2611,21 @@ > # @base-node-name: #optional the block driver state node name of the > # common backing file. (Since 2.1) > # > +# @backing-file: #optional The backing file string to write into the active > +# layer. This filename is not validated. > +# > +# If a pathname string is such that it cannot be > +# resolved be QEMU, that means that subsequent QMP > or Copy-and-paste strikes again :) s/be/by/ > +++ b/qmp-commands.hx > @@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ EQMP > > { > .name = "block-stream", > - .args_type = > "device:B?,base:s?,base-node-name:s?,speed:o?,on-error:s?", > + .args_type = > "device:B?,base:s?,base-node-name:s?,speed:o?,backing-file:s?,on-error:s?", > .mhandler.cmd_new = qmp_marshal_input_block_stream, > }, Missing documentation of backing-file? Oh, the entire block-stream call is missing documentation, when compared to the block-commit call. Oh well, I can't fault you for that, although it might be nice to rectify while we are improving it. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature